We all have a different perception of the reality surrounding us. This is normal. We all perceive reality through the lens of our expectations, fears and wishes, our worldview and our prejudices. Our emotions are powerful colouring lenses or even filters of our perception. But it seems the need of getting accepted by others, power, status, ownership, and achievements can lead not only to a strong distortion of our perceptions, but also to a loss of contact with reality. It appears that people who are exposed to excessive amounts of one of the above-mentioned states are living without direct connection to the world around them. The more they get of them and the longer they stay in this situation, the more their perception is based on fiction.
Too many top leaders in politics and business are subject to this distortion because they stay in office too long. One term is enough! Only exceptional leaders can sustain a second term without getting “lost in space”.
One term of a maximum of five years should be the rule for all top leaders. A second term should be linked to exceptional performance. In addition, there should be a break for at least five years before they can assume a new leadership position. During those five years they should either serve as counsellors or go back to their previous jobs. This could help them correct their perception of reality and avoid spending their energy on a second term, i.e. being concerned with reelection. It would also give more people the opportunity to serve the organization or the society.
The U.S. President Obama seems to be one of those exceptions. His strength is his closeness to the base because he has not been involved in top politics for too long and because he has a natural instinct about the needs, worries and dreams of his constituency. He seems to have an intuitive insight about the reality around him.
In addition, we could see consultative bodies being elected for a much longer period of time, but they would not be allowed to become active top leaders.
Too much power, money, status and attention are powerful distortions of perception; therefore necessitating limits on how much power, income, incentives etc, top leaders can receive. Time is another, additional factor. Clear contracts with performance criteria, expected results and achievements, as well as the participation in the up- and downside could correct some of these distortions. This would prevent top managers and top politicians from behaving like entrepreneurs with other people’s money and literally no personal risk. There are enough entrepreneurial talents willing to take up this kind of challenge. The assertion of not being able to attract qualified people is an excuse to increase their own salary. There are enough leadership talents with the right entrepreneurial spirit and the readiness to serve the organization and the society, if they can get a meaningful job. Meaningfulness is a much more powerful drive than incentives. It motivates other kinds of people to take up the leadership challenge. It is time to get rid of those false entrepreneurs who, at the end, only cost a lot of jobs and taxpayers’ money!
It looks like the control mechanisms of the corporations fail to work properly once greed takes over and is fuelled by insane incentives. Maybe a significant part of the advisory boards should consist of customers and consumers?
We need to re-invent the governing bodies and entities of the organizations and set clear limits to avoid distortions due to greed. Those who are unhappy with theses agreements can still develop a corporation of their own.
We need to bring top leaders closer to the reality of the organizations and the society they serve. Leaders with a distorted perception of reality can not only ruin the economy, costing the taxpayer thousands of billions, but they can bring death and destruction as well.